Sat
Jan 23

The Lovely Bones is why I don’t have a girlfriend right now.

Well… we’ll get to that eventually.

I finished reading The Lovely Bones by Alice Sebold yesterday, and then tonight I went ahead and watched the movie that Peter Jackson made out of it. I don’t know whether anyone else who visits this site has read or watched it as well, but for no better reason than to kill a little time I will break down my particular opinions of them both for you.

On my most recent flight into Vegas I was seated next to a woman who I noticed to be reading the final few pages of The Lovely Bones. At the time, I knew of the book only because of the movie trailers that seemed to run during every single commercial break around Christmas. The trailers made the movie look pretty interesting and when I asked this woman if she liked the book she gave me a short, but extremely enthusiastic dose of praise. I think her exact words may have been, “Oh my God! I LOVE IT!”

Having just been given a Kindle for Christmas (thanks!) I decided to hop onto Amazon’s 3G network and download the book while waiting for our plane to takeoff.

Ok, I don’t want to spoil anything for those of you who still plan on reading the book or watching the movie. Come back when you are done and let me know your thoughts, but for everyone else you can click on the following link to read the rest of this post…


I breezed through the first 70% of the book in my first two nights. When he noticed what I was reading Jim told me that Lizzie had hated the book, but while only halfway into it, I definitely disagreed. But by the 75% mark I hated it too.

While the first seventy percent took me only two days to dominate, the final thirty lasted nearly two weeks. I honestly can’t remember ever reading a book where my opinion changed so dramatically partway through. The first hundred pages of Lord of the Rings was a massive chore for me, but the next thousand were amazing. Aside from that, though, I usually have a pretty solid grasp of a book after the first few chapters. Weirdly, The Lovely Bones completely fell apart in the second half. What started as an interesting, enjoyable read quickly devolved into an eye-rolling sack of girly nonsense. I literally used the final few chapters to practice speed reading.

When the book was finally over I really didn’t even feel like watching the movie anymore, despite having been so eager for so long. Of course, I sat down and watched it anyways, but mostly out of a sense of obligation. I could only hope that Peter Jackson had somehow saved the story from itself.

He didn’t.

For those that don’t know, The Lovely Bones is a story written from the point of view of a 14-year-old girl named Susie who gets murdered. That’s only the setup, actually, since she gets raped and killed in the book’s first chapter. The rest of the novel follows Susie as she watches her family from Heaven. The book tells a tale of the heartache of a senseless tragedy, the struggle of a family to survive in its aftermath, and the mystery of trying to catch a killer.

That description sounds like a pretty good read to me, and for the first half of the book it actually was. But then… things got super weird.

Around the two-thirds mark a cute, sad story about a dead girl watching her family from Heaven somehow transforms into a helplessly stupid literary clusterfuck. For no imaginable reason Alice Sebold suddenly decided to take a page from Stephanie Meyer’s approach to Breaking Dawn: she threw away everything that was good about her novel and instead asked herself, “what would a stupid 12-year old girl write?”

I don’t know, maybe the author just got bored.

Having watched from a distance for so long, Susie suddenly leaves Heaven and starts actively haunting the human world. She follows people around and randomly reveals herself to them (a power which no other ghosts seem to have, by the way, and which she didn’t have before either). The living people on Earth are never scared or surprised at seeing a ghost, naturally, and her haunting always makes them smile and feel loved. Nobody tells anyone else that they are seeing a murdered spirit, even though they all are. It is like each character has their own totally romantic secret.

Then, one of the girls from school suddenly develops the power to see other dead people. She becomes a stereotypical loner outcast and moves to New York City where she wanders the streets by herself, seeing the ghosts of murdered people. When she uses her powers to see what happened to a murdered child, she doesn’t bother calling the police or telling anybody. Instead she makes a little note of it in her five-star and goes about the rest of her day.

All of a sudden, everybody starts having sex with one another.

The killer keeps killing people, but we don’t hear much of anything about that – or the still unsolved murder investigation that dominated the first half of the book – because the main detective starts having sex with Susie’s mom. Unable to stand being around her family, the mother abandons her husband and children and runs away to live in a California wine orchard for five years. A few pages later it is suddenly five years in the future. Susie’s mom comes back from California and her husband takes her back immediately, the two now more in love with each other than ever before. Awww, it’s romantic AND realistic…

Towards the end of the book, the girl who sees dead people randomly comes across the spot where Susie’s body has been secretly buried for five years. In a completely unexpected twist (unexpected for a good reason), Susie comes down from Heaven and possesses the girl’s body. The audience gets twisted again though, because rather than tell someone about the body buried only ten feet away… or tell the police who killed her… or go see the family that she had been haunting relentlessly since her death… now-human Susie immediately has sex with a boy from her school that she barely knew, but always liked.

This tale of supernatural passion is a little weird when you remember the fact that she is still 14 and he is about 20. Bad gets way, way worse when in the middle of their preteen sexual escapade she looks into the boy’s eyes and tells him, “I am Susie.” Instead of being at all surprised to be having sex with a girl who has been possessed by the ghost of his murdered adolescent sorta-friend, the guy smiles longingly and says, “I knew there was something different about you.”

W.T.F.

After she finishes knocking boots, Susie leaves Earth again and decides that now it’s ok to finally leave the world behind her. Her unfinished business has been taken care.

Seriously…. W.T.F…

Her unfinished business was that she desperately needed to jump some dong? It had nothing to do with her horribly grief-stricken family? It had nothing to do with an unsolved murder and catching her killer (who is never caught, by the way)? There is no higher lesson to be had about finding acceptance in death, or forgiveness in the face of tragedy? All she needed was to ride some teenage dick.

At the very end of the book, before she finally ascends into Heaven, Susie makes one last Earthly stop and watches as the man who killed her tries to lure another young girl into his car. Susie uses her ghost powers to snap an icicle dangling over the man’s head, killing him.

Ugh.

So that sweet young innocent girl who we have lovingly followed for a few hundred pages spends the final act of the novel…

1) forcing control over a human body like some kind of demon
2) tricking a boy into statutory raping having sex with her
3) murdering a man

… and then she goes to Heaven with a giant Happily Ever After.

Hey, Alice Sebold: Shame. On. You.

Not at all surprisingly the movie plays out exactly like the book. The first half was decently good, but the final third was borderline unwatchable. I would actually say that the movie is probably better than the book, to be honest, if only because Peter Jackson goes nuts with his CGI. The story is still really bad, but P-Jax does a good job of making things look cool (I am a big fan of the ships-in-bottles sequence). The end result feels like a complicate mix of Pan’s Labyrinth, The Fall, What Dreams May Come, Zodiac, The Sixth Sense, and Twilight… but clearly nowhere close to as good as any one of them (except Twilight).

Take that however you want.

Oh, and the reason I say that The Lovely Bones is why I don’t have a girlfriend is because looking at reviews on Amazon the book has a 4+ star rating after 3000 reviews. On IMDB the movie has a 6.8 rating after more than 9000 reviews. It is becoming increasingly clear to me that no matter what their age may really be, all girls are still twelve years old at heart. They will completely love anything, no matter how stupid in concept or how poor in execution, so long as the annoying teenage girl gets to eventually have sex with the annoying, older boy.

IT’S TRUE LOVE!!

Chuck Klosterman wrote wrote a series of funny essays about how all girls have a deeply rooted, but thoroughly unrealistic expectation of love that can be most clearly represented by the works of Coldplay and John Cusack. Klosterman whines that he will never be able to fully satisfy any woman because they are only interested in a fantasy that no man can possibly uphold.

I agree, but I think it’s more than that. I believe that for girls the ultimate romance is being passed an anonymous note during third-grade recess. The girl basks in the secret danger of that note, then follows its directions to an unseen part of the playground where she meets a mysterious boy with a bad reputation who the girl never before even thought about liking until that very moment. He gives her a simple kiss just before the bell rings and everybody has to go back inside.

In my mind, it all breaks down to that. Forget roses and chocolates and exotic getaways. Girls just want that secret kiss.

If I could somehow bottle and sell that I would be a rich, rich man. Clearly, I wouldn’t even have to package it well at all. As proof just take a look at Sebold, Meyer, or the tens of thousands of overt romance novels that don’t even bother pretending to be real literature.

Honestly, I may never vote for a woman to be president. All it takes is a hundred pages of Nicholas Sparks (who I also think is a terrible writer, for the record) to reduce any woman to a blabbering mess. “But Allie and Noah were meant to be together!! It’s SOOO romantic!!” Two hundred years ago stupid girls had their bonnets in a bunch over Elizabeth Bennett and Mr. Darcy. Today it’s Bella Swan and Edward Cullen (and sadly, still Elizabeth Bennett and Mr Darcy).

In her defense at least Jane Austin could write. Stephanie Meyer, Alice Sebold… not so much.

20 people care

  1. more typos than your last 100 entries, but funny read anyway lol

  2. Yeah, sorry. I wrote that in a state of exhaustion, but I just went back and rewrote some of it… hopefully it’s a bit better now.

  3. Great post. Chuck K rules.

  4. Hilarious post, Jason. Your post makes it pretty clear to me why I generally stick with super nerdy, fantasy/series series/novels. They’re well-written, interesting, unique, and fun to read. What you just described in this post sounds like the exact opposite. Congrats on getting through the book and movie, though. I don’t think I would have had the resolve to do that. Two other things:

    1) Klosterman recently got married

    2) I still hold to my opinion that Breaking Dawn was the best Twilight book.

    PS. I realize that not everyone has the same opinion about fantasy/sci-fi books that I do. Oh well.

  5. Jim, you’re going to have to elaborate on #2 there. For me it was easily, easily the worst of the four.

    Was it the half-undead baby drinking Bella’s blood from inside her belly (because clearly a woman’s uterus is connected to her stomach so Bella can drink blood and have it go directly into her baby)? Or was it the ‘epic’ LotR-style vampire battle? (I summon my various friends from around the world to join me to defeat evil!!)

    Or was it just because the annoying teenage girl finally gets to have a lot of sex with the annoying, older boy?

  6. That last one probably

  7. hahaha I liked it more for the X-Men-style battle / skills they had. And I liked how we went through three books wondering if she was going to become a Vampire, and then she did, and then we got to see how that went for the fourth book. I don’t know, I just remember liking that book more than the others. Although, the first book was solid, too.

  8. spoiler alert, good thing I wasnt planning on reading or watching any of that series

  9. Sorry Eric, I figured anyone that had any interest whatsoever in reading those books would have done so already. Especially considering all the mentions it gets on this blog.

  10. Well you had me until this: “I may never vote for a woman to be president. All it takes is a hundred pages of Nicholas Sparks … to reduce any woman to a blabbering mess.”

    There are basically two categories of women out there: the ones who read this book and love it and the ones who don’t. Grouping us all into the former category is like saying all guys act like the idiots on Tool Academy. For every girl out there who went to see He’s Just Not That Into You on opening night, there’s a guy who thinks Two and a Half Men is funny. It goes both ways.

  11. well, in fairness… we (guys) really are all raging Tools at heart too.

  12. In response to the Breaking Dawn criticism, I’m with you on the fact that she made some pretty ridiculous choices when writing that book (the baby cracked her spine and ate its way out of her uterus..), but I can’t get on board with your other complaints. Babies do (somewhat indirectly) eat everything you eat–your uterus doesn’t have to be connected to your stomach to do that. Evidence: the crack baby, fetal alcohol syndrome, babies who come out with orange Cheeto fingers. I also liked the X-Men style battle at the end, but mostly just because by that time I was willing to allow for a little ridiculousness. It was fun (if silly), but that’s all I really wanted from the Twilight series anyway.

  13. In that case, I’d rather not have Matsuflex in office, either. Maybe only chimps should run for President?

  14. Another hilarious part about the Ray/Susie boning session: Susie may have been creepily spying on him (from limbo heaven) for the last 8 years, but to him she’s just some girl he had a crush on (from afar) in eighth grade who was killed and who he, most likely, hadn’t thought about much since. “Oh, I thought I was having sex with my girlfriend but instead it’s you, the ghost of that girl from middle school. Cool, let’s do this!” If books like this get published and make millions of dollars, it really makes me wonder about the books that get rejected.

  15. You two keep saying “X-Men style battle,” but that phrase makes it seem so much cooler than it really was. Here are some of their awesome powers…

    (reference via this link)

    Edward – reads people’s minds

    Alice – sees the future… sometimes

    Jasper – influences people’s feelings

    Maggie- can tell when people lie.

    Eleazar- he can pick out the people who has potential powers when they turn.

    Aro- he can touch you and see everything that you ever thought of or said.

    Demetri- is a very good tracker

    chelsea- can break the connection between partners

    oh man, those powers make for such a crazy awesome battle!! Who needs laser beams coming out of your eyes or adamantium claws? These badasses can make somebody a little bit sad or figure out if they are telling the truth!

    Then, worst of all was the big reveal of Bella’s super dumb power… of which everyone else was inexplicably in massive awe. Her uber power is… defense! She makes an invisible vampire blanket that she can throw over people near her. It won’t block laser beams or bullets, of course, but if that extremely dangerous lie-detecting vampire girl tries to detect any of Bella’s lies… it totally won’t work.

    Yes… it’s exactly like X-men.

  16. Did you read this book like 10 minutes ago? No way I could have remembered all of that.

    But yeah, no one’s saying the vampires were as cool as the X-Men (one of the nerdier debates ever, btw)–I just thought the different/competing powers were fun and “X-Men style” seemed like an easy way to reference that part of the story.

  17. I kind of agree with everyone here. Like Lizzie said, clearly (or maybe not-so-clearly) we weren’t trying to say Breaking Dawn was like X-Men in the way they fought at the end. I wasn’t even trying to compare them in that way at all. The term “X-Men style” was simply the easiest and most-straightforward way for me to get across my point. So yes, “defense” isn’t exactly the coolest skill we’ve ever run across. But I still enjoyed the book during these scenes.

    Lizzie, Jason linked to his source within his last comment. So I doubt he actually remembered all that stuff on his own.

    For me, I think the reason I liked these books boils down to how I read / watch movies. For whatever reason, I’m one of those people that lets the stories come to me. Perfect example: Lizzie and I will be watching CSI. I’ll just sit there and watch the episode and I’ll let the story unfold / come to me. This way I’m kind of always surprised / intrigued by the outcome. On the other hand, Lizzie sits there and tries to figure out exactly what is going to happen during the whole episode (which she does 99% of the time). Neither way of watching is bad — just different styles. The reason I bring this up is because I feel like a lot of times, I’ll enjoy some movies / tv shows / books more than other people simply because I let the stories “come to me”. I’m not really sure if I’m describing my point all that well. Here’s a really stupid explanation that basically self-burns me. It’s like I’m a little kid who just sits in front of the movie with a smile on his face and watches without critiquing. Maybe that’s a good way to explain it.

    Anyway, I think that’s why the last book didn’t bother me. I wasn’t reading it thinking, “This is ridiculous”. I was reading it thinking, “Cool, everything is coming to an end and everything’s coming together for a final battle”.

  18. Lizzie, I didn’t actually remember everyone’s names and powers, but I remembered thinking they were dumb. I included a reference link for that reason.

    Jim, you probably liked it because she finally chooses dreamboat Edward.

    But seriously, Breaking Dawn is nothing but the culmination and realization (in my own opinion) of all the girlish obsessions and fantasies that make me gag in real life.

    Still in high school, Bella is obsessed with getting married.

    Bella is obsessed with being with Edward forever… until he leaves, then she totally loves Jacob… until Edward comes back, then Bella wants to be with him forever again.

    Bella becomes obsessed with having sex with Edward.

    Bella becomes obsessed with having a baby.

    In Breaking Dawn she (finally? it’s been maybe two years since they first met) marries Edward, becomes a vampire (thus allowing for the whole ‘forever’ thing), has lots and lots of sex (turns out that’s all vampires really do with eternity), gets preggers, and then has a baby.

    This is the complete realization of nearly every woman’s apparent concept of true happiness. A man and babies, forever and ever.

    That’s why I say that these books are the reason I don’t have a girlfriend. It’s because for everything else that’s great about most girls, I can’t yet bring myself to happily accept or even casually ignore the fundamental pieces of their psyche that I find ridiculous.

  19. I think you’re attributing these characteristics to a way larger percentage of women than there really are that actually think like / want to be Bella. Obviously I know you aren’t trying to say that ALL women act and think like Bella does. But still. Not everyone who likes these books likes them because they can relate to Bella or want to be Bella.

    Also, quit trying to pick up girls outside of Hot Topic and Paramore concerts.

    (ps. paramore is sweet)

  20. Eh, I think you really are giving me a bit too much credit here Jim. That actually “is” the point that I was making. I wasn’t talking about ALL women, of course… just the VAST MAJORITY of them.

    The point that I was making in my post, more so maybe than in the comments, is that the reason these sorts of stories are so wildly popular (and extremely highly rated) is because they directly appeal to a fundamental desire within (nearly) all girls.

    That’s just science.

    In The Lovely Bones the reader follows a girl who will spend an eternity as a teenager, stalking and humping some exotic boy she barely knows. Same thing in Twilight. Different versions of the same basic story.

    It’s ridiculous in my mind to say that so many people read and enjoy these books because, while they don’t actually identify with Bella at all, they just really like vampires and x-men battles. I have to believe that the percentage of the readership to which you apparently belong, Jim, is extremely small.

    Admittedly, I read the books and felt no connection with Bella at all. For me it was meant to be just a mindless, fun read. My point is not that people can’t like the books without identifying with the character, but rather, if it weren’t for the primal connection girls seem to have with annoying teenage girls / annoying older boys / sex / marriage / babies there is no chance these particular books would be so highly rated and so widely read.